Hi, the manuals I have for the G5 Lightweight state that Ignition Timing should be set fully advanced at 1/4 inch BTDC, using the dip stick method through the plug hole. Does anyone know the BTDC setting in degrees when using a timing disc on the cranckshaft?
Regards, Andy.
Timing by Degrees
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 12:00 am
- Location: BURTON-ON-TRENT UK
-
- Member
- Posts: 2882
- Joined: Mon Jan 01, 1990 12:00 am
- Location: USA USA
Timing by Degrees
Why, unless you want to use a strobe? The combustion process is only indirectly related to crankshaft angle but is directly related to the piston position. If you wish to use a strobe, the it will show the dynamics better but the piston position is still better to establish the reference marks. Cheers, Don.
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 12:00 am
- Location: BURTON-ON-TRENT UK
Timing by Degrees
Don, thanks for the advice; my reason for enquiring after the timing disc option is because I'm fitting electronic ignition and was under the impression (wrongly perhaps?) that it will provide greater accuracy - necessary for electronic ignition? What's your opinion?
Regards, Andy
Regards, Andy
-
- Posts: 2453
- Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: NORTHAMPTONSHIRE UK
Timing by Degrees
quote:
necessary for electronic ignition?
Even with EI the rod down the plughole is better. I tried both methods on my twin and the bike ran better with the standard method of ignition setting.
Don't use a pencil..............
necessary for electronic ignition?
Even with EI the rod down the plughole is better. I tried both methods on my twin and the bike ran better with the standard method of ignition setting.
Don't use a pencil..............
- Ludwig
- Member
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 1:00 am
- Location: GERMANY
Timing by Degrees
1/4" BTD at 85.5mm strocke results in an angle of 28 degrees - assuming a typical crank-ratio
(I don't know the con rod length, but the influence is very small, less then +- 0.5 degrees).
Regards Ludwig
(I don't know the con rod length, but the influence is very small, less then +- 0.5 degrees).
Regards Ludwig
-
- Posts: 857
- Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 2:19 pm
- Location: SURREY UK
Timing by Degrees
The various manuals for the '53 350 variously state the measured BTD as 3/8, 7/16 or 1/2", but the only angle figure I have seen is 37.
So I built a spreadsheet to calculate mm and degrees (probably the same as Ludwigs as the result for 85.5 stroke is the same as he said). 37 degrees corresponds to the 1/2" measurement for the 93mm stroke 350 by the way.
If anybody wants a live copy of the spreadsheet send me a PM with email number as the forum email doesn't allow attachments. You have to know how to use Goalseek.
Stan
So I built a spreadsheet to calculate mm and degrees (probably the same as Ludwigs as the result for 85.5 stroke is the same as he said). 37 degrees corresponds to the 1/2" measurement for the 93mm stroke 350 by the way.
If anybody wants a live copy of the spreadsheet send me a PM with email number as the forum email doesn't allow attachments. You have to know how to use Goalseek.
Stan
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 12:00 am
- Location: BURTON-ON-TRENT UK
Timing by Degrees
Dear all, Apologies for the delay in responding - work got in the way!! Many thanks for all the advice; it's been very helpful and much appreciated. Stan - I've responded to your e-mail.
Regards,
Andy.
Regards,
Andy.
-
- Posts: 802
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 10:45 pm
- Location: GLD NETHERLANDS
Timing by Degrees
Stan, not very important but published degrees for 350 vary also. One 1954 instruction book says 35 1/2 at 7/16" but another one, also 1954, says 37 at the same 7/16". For 1955: 39 at 1/2". The published figure for 1/2" corresponds to my calculations (38.8) while I get 36.1 at 7/16".
Albert
Albert